Finding and comparing evidence, and exploring possible effects, can support study design decisions. Clinical and commercial approvals remain with authorised people.
← Trust Centre
AI governance
Evidence people can review. Decisions people still own.
Your team needs to know where an AI answer came from and who should check it. Our public examples use sample data. Evidence access, AI providers and permitted uses must be agreed for an evaluation.
Public information · Reviewed 27 September 2026
For each AI task, agree its purpose, allowed sources and data, provider terms, testing, monitoring and human review. AI cannot make clinical, regulatory, vendor selection or commercial decisions.
Check which documents are available →
The public examples use sample data. Check what is available for an evaluation and which security and quality documents can be shared before sending sensitive information.
Evidence to review
What your team needs to know.
Use this list to plan your checks. A listed safeguard is something to verify, not confirmation that it is in place or that supporting documents can be shared.
Review areaCurrent statusPublic information
Check how an AI answer was produced: the model, sources, dates, relevance, assumptions, limits and human review needed. Where approval applies, verify that the record identifies the approving person.
Assess study comparisons by indication, phase, population and design. Examine source coverage and the basis of each comparison for your use case.
Authorised people review the reasons for a change and approve the exact protocol version.
Model providers, retention, training restrictions and data routes must be agreed, documented and verified before production. This page does not confirm one setting for all services.
Testing for each use case, its limitations, review thresholds and change monitoring are defined for the intended production scope.
Significant changes to models, AI instructions, providers or rules need a recorded review that reflects their possible impact.
Common questions
Answers for your supplier review.
These answers describe what is publicly confirmed. Check the agreed safeguards and supporting evidence for the service you plan to use.
Request supporting documentsNo. Tenvia presents decision support. Clinical, regulatory, quality and commercial authority remains with appropriately authorised people.
Documents to request
Ask what evidence is available for your review.
The list below shows documents you may need for a supplier review. We must confirm which are available and can be shared before granting access.
01AI system overviewCheck availabilityOn request
02Evidence source and retrieval modelCheck availabilityOn request
03Approach to matching relevant studiesCheck availabilityOn request
04Intended use and limitations statementCheck availabilityOn request
05Provider and data use scheduleCheck availabilityOn request
06Evaluation summaryCheck availabilityOn request
07Human oversight and change control modelCheck availabilityOn request
Security & supplier review
A clear path
to your review.
Explore the product, discuss a study or request assurance evidence. Choose the conversation your team needs.
What would you like to review?
01 / Choose your reviewConfidentiality agreement and approved access
Tell us which security, privacy, quality or architecture evidence your team needs to review.
Your review
02 / Describe your prioritiesPlease keep patient information and confidential study documents out of this request.
Submit your enquiry directly through HubSpot.
Tenvia will contact you to follow up.
Prefer a direct conversation?