Keep ownership even when your CRO does not use Tenvia.
Build or import the protocol, review evidence, preserve decisions, bring in CRO recommendations and prepare execution requirements in an environment controlled by the Sponsor.
Tenvia Platform
Tenvia gives authorised teams one current view across protocol intent, relevant external evidence, the CRO operating plan, sites and existing clinical technology. Fewer vendor chases, fewer status decks and less manual reconciliation.
Intent, relevant evidence, decisions and work remain connected.
One operating model
Start with one Sponsor or CRO team. Tenvia carries study intent into a structured execution blueprint, connected delivery and continuous oversight while preserving the option to bring partners into the same controlled context later.
Flexible adoption
A Sponsor or CRO can use Tenvia independently. Shared access becomes useful when both teams need to work from the same study record.
Build or import the protocol, review evidence, preserve decisions, bring in CRO recommendations and prepare execution requirements in an environment controlled by the Sponsor.
Structure the study, challenge operational assumptions, prepare recommendations and create controlled outputs for the Sponsor as part of your delivery method.
Sponsor intent, CRO expertise, external evidence and Tenvia analysis come together with explicit authority and one attributable decision history.
One continuous Tenvia system
Approved decisions, requirements, commitments and observations stay with the study through each handoff.
Use internally as a Sponsor or CRO, then share controlled outputs.
→Send complete requirement packages externally. Vendors do not need an account.
→Upload external proposals and compare them against one baseline.
→Connect authorised systems without forcing every organisation to change at once.
→Monitor authorised execution even when partners continue to work externally.
Bring authorised information from the protocol, CRO plan, sites, specialist systems and relevant evidence sources into one study view.
Stop reconstructing the trial from vendor portals, searches and status decks.Use the study context to find relevant precedent and connect each insight to its source, assumptions, confidence and limitations.
Reach decisions faster without losing the evidence behind them.Prepare the work, route the approval and record what was authorised, executed and verified.
Reduce coordination work while people retain clinical and commercial authority.One change, kept connected
Follow one amendment without switching between documents, vendor systems and reconciliation spreadsheets.
Amendment 3 changes eligibility. The approved baseline stays protected.
Comparable trials, reported outcomes, literature and regulatory material are matched to the study context where available.
Population, sites, enrolment, burden and affected technology requirements remain traceable to the approved decision.
Technology and service proposals can be compared against the same scope, assumptions and dependencies.
A single owned work package replaces separate vendor and site chases while the Sponsor retains decision authority.
Approved changes move through validated connector boundaries where supported, then return to the same study record.
Designed around authority
Capability increases only when evidence, validation and human authority support it.
Read or receive only the exact information authorised for this study.
Explain divergence and prepare attributable work for qualified review.
Execute a supported operation only after authority, approval and verification are confirmed.
The availability and direction of each connection depend on the external system’s supported interfaces, customer permissions, validation requirements and the Tenvia connector’s release status.
Integration coverage
Select a category to see what Tenvia can exchange, how the connection works and where approval remains with your team.
Study configuration, visit windows, eligibility flags, queries and tasks
Connector availability depends on the selected platform, its supported interfaces and the customer’s authorised configuration. Tenvia confirms the connection route during technical scoping.
For the CRO
Set ownership, workflows and connection patterns once. Prepare controlled outputs for the Sponsor, then invite the Sponsor into the workspace when direct collaboration is appropriate.
The CRO can lead operations while the Sponsor retains clinical and contractual authority. Sites receive a simpler view of the work.The Sponsor does not need to adopt Tenvia first.
A single coordination model can cover every vendor.
Operating knowledge carries into the next study.
A controlled start
Start where disconnected work costs the most. Prove the value, then add the next system or study.
Weeks 1 to 2. Map the current baseline, critical decisions, systems, owners and the reconciliation work that takes the most time.
Weeks 2 to 3. Agree source objects, access, read and write boundaries, evidence and failure handling for the first systems.
Weeks 4 to 6. Configure the study model, test mappings and run the selected decision thread with fixture or approved data.
Led by the customer · Confirm permissions, data quality, audit behaviour, recovery and the qualified review route.
After approval · Activate the agreed scope, monitor health and add the next system or study without rebuilding the operating model.
Bring the systems you already use